O MNIE

ACOUSTIC BLADES

Nazywam się Wojciech Zawada, na forach internetowych jestem aktywny pod nickiem wojtas13. Acoustic Blades to ukoronowanie mojej „ostrej” pasji. Dlaczego Acoustic Blades? Moja podstawowa praca jest związana z dźwiękiem, ale przede wszystkim każdemu aspektowi użycia noża towarzyszą dźwięki. Czy będzie to dźwięk rozcinanego materiału, dźwięk ostrza przesuwanego po osełce czy charakterystyczne kliknięcie kydexowej pochwy zawsze użyciu noża towarzyszy dźwięk. A więc: Cokolwiek tniesz,  …jest to akustyczne.

Noże towarzyszyły mi w zasadzie od zawsze. Najpierw jako najbardziej podstawowe podręczne narzędzie, później również jako obiekt kolekcjonerski. Staram się łączyć te wszystkie doświadczenia w swoich wyrobach. Przy wykonywaniu moich noży największy nacisk kładę na projekt. Musi harmonijnie łączyć funkcję, formę oraz zastosowane materiały

INFORMACJE / FAQ

Moje noże są wykonywane w dwóch standardach wykończenia. Noże oznaczone jako „Tool Knife” – „TK” wykańczane są maszynowo, na okładziny stosowane są prostsze materiały. Są to  przede wszystkim narzędzia przeznaczone do pracy. Pozostałe noże są wykańczane ręcznie. Rękojeści wykonywane są z wyższej jakości materiałów, ale całość nadal pozostaje w pełni funkcjonalnym narzędziem.

Wykonuję pochwy kydexowe na zamówienie. Aby zamówić pochwę, należy skontaktować się ze mną przez e-mail: wojtas13@acousticblades.pl.

Stosuję przemysłową powłokę antykorozyjną. Mogę również wykonać ją na zlecenie na innym nożu / ostrzu. Aby dowiedzieć się więcej, należy skontaktować się ze mną przez e-mail: wojtas13@acousticblades.pl.

Aby kupić oferowany przeze mnie nóż, należy skontaktować sie ze mną przez e-mail: wojtas13@acousticblades.pl.

Nie przyjmuję zamówień na noże. Wszystkie aktualnie dostępne noże można znaleźć w dziele Noże -> Dostępne. Jeżeli zależy Ci na zmianach w moich projektach lub realizacji własnego projektu napisz do mnie. Może coś da się zrobić.

Noże wysyłam za pośrednictwem Poczty Polskiej. Koszty przesyłki zostaną podane przy zamówieniu. Zależą głównie od wartości noża (ubezpieczenie) oraz od jego rozmiarów. Możliwa jest również wysyłka międzynarodowa.

BLOG

PRZEJDŹ DO BLOGA

Assistive Equipment That Can Help People with Cerebral Palsy Write

Assistive Equipment That Can Help People with Cerebral Palsy Write Many people with cerebral palsy have a difficult time writing as a result of limitations in muscular function, fine motor control, joint function, and range of motion. Fortunately, there are lots of kinds of assistive tools and technologies that can help people with cerebral palsy to create with greater ease. These could be broken down into a few categories: People who have cerebral palsy often have a problem with grasping small objects, and experience hand fatigue and pain if they use traditional writing utensils. Fortunately, there are lots of affordable tools that are much easier to grasp, make writing more content, and help the consumer to safely strengthen their hand muscles. A few examples include: Pencil grips ($4.95): Pencil grips are for sale in various shapes and colors from several vendors. The angle of the grip and finger guard helps to ensure that the fingers come in the position that is proper minimize hand fatigue. NuMuv Grip Aid ($10.95): An addition to your graspable part of an object such as for example silverware, writing utensils, toothbrushes, etc. that may provide the user greater independence while doing everyday tasks. Jumbo GRIP Triangular Pencils ($16.95 for a pack of 12): A transition between grips and pencils that are regular these are wider and now have soft little dots to assist with grip.

„Affordable” Utility Service: What is Regulation’s Role? Because of the nation’s economy stressed, politicians are pressuring regulators to make utility service „affordable.” This picture has three problems. Wealth Redistribution is certainly not Regulation’s Department The regulator identifies prudent costs, computes a revenue requirement to cover those costs, then designs rates to produce the revenue requirement under embedded cost ratemaking. Rate design makes each customer category bear the expense it causes. None among these steps—prudent cost identification, revenue requirement computation, cost allocation—involves affordability. Affordability becomes an issue only we lower rates for the unfortunate by raising rates for others if we jigger the numbers—if. Achieving affordability through rate design means cost that is compromising to redistribute wealth. It resembles taxation of just one class to profit another, using this exception: With taxation, citizens can retire representatives whose votes offend; but with utility service, captive customers are stuck utilizing the rates regulators set. Instead of shifting costs between customer classes, regulators might redistribute wealth in another way: by “taxing” shareholders, i.e., reducing shareholder returns underneath the otherwise level that is appropriate. But taxing shareholders isn’t any more the regulator’s domain than is taxing other customers. And it’s likely unconstitutional: Having invested to serve the public, shareholders expect „just compensation,” undiminished by a forced contribution for affordability. Moving money among citizens is essential to a society that is fair. Poverty is intolerable and charity that is private suffices, so government steps in. But helping the luckless ought to be done by political leaders, who must justify their actions to your electorate; not by professional regulators, whose focus must certanly be industry performance. Affordability of any product—groceries, a Lexus, or utility service—depends on a single’s income and wealth, as well as on the expense of other products. The poor could better afford utility service if we raised their income and increased their wealth. Or if we lowered their price of housing, health care, transportation, or education. But these initiatives are outside regulators’ authority. In order to make regulators responsible for affordability is illogical. Cheap Energy is Cheap Politics Politicians who argue for affordability take the road that is easy. To legislate economic development, greenness, reliability, energy independence, and technology leadership, all efforts that increase costs, while commanding the regulator which will make service „affordable,” is low-risk politics, responsibility-avoidance politics, cheap politics. When politicians call for „lower rates,” the electorate feels entitled to get in place of encouraged to contribute. But no family, no congregation, no civil society, thrives if its key verb is „take” in the place of „give.” So when lower rates now result in higher costs later, citizens become cynical. Self-doubting, also, as they question their capability to tell apart pander from policy. These are the total results when politicians avoid their responsibility for affordability. „Affordability” Undermines Regulation’s Responsibility Mathematician Carson Chow says he is found the reason for our obesity epidemic: low food prices. Studying 40 many years of data, he spotted both correlation and causation between girth growth and cost declines. He traced these trends to government farm policy shifts (from spending money on non-production to stimulating full production) and technology boosts (which lowered production costs). The reduced the fee, the greater amount of production; the more production, the greater (fast) food; the greater food, the greater amount of calories available; the greater calories available, the greater calories consumed. See C. Dreifus, „A Mathematical Challenge to Obesity,” The New York Times (May 14, 2012). We are both over-consuming and under-appreciating: Dr. Chow found that „Americans are wasting food at a progressively increasing rate.” (Fairness point: Chow has his doubters. See Michael Moyer, „The Mathematician’s Obesity Fallacy,” Scientific American (May 15, 2012). What does food need to do with „affordable” utility service? A regulator’s job is always to regulate—to establish performance standards, then align compensation with compliance. In this equation, affordability just isn’t a variable. Which will make service affordable to your unlucky, the commission will have to lower the price below cost. That leads to overconsumption, to Dr. Chow’s „waste.” This inefficiency hurts everyone. Economic efficiency exists when no further action can create benefits without increasing costs by a lot more than the huge benefits. Conversely, economic inefficiency exists as soon as we forego some action that, if taken, can make someone better off without making anyone worse off. To over-consume, to waste, to do something inefficiently, to leave good results up for grabs, makes everyone worse off. Underpricing in the true name of affordability makes someone worse off, unnecessarily. How sensible is that? Actions for Affordability: The Proper Roles for Regulators Unless essential services are affordable, government will never be credible. Regulators, being section of government, need to help. (A commission staff chief told me 25 years ago, „Sometimes you need to put away your principles and do what’s right.”) And some statutes that are regulatory require the regulator to produce service „affordable.” (as it is the outcome, i will be told, in Vanuatu, an 83-island nation in the South Pacific.) Listed below are three ways, in line with economic efficiency, for regulators to address affordability. Assist the unlucky reduce usage. Regulators can advocate for affordability by pressing for policies which make consumption less costly, like improved housing stock, „orbs” that signal high prices, and efficient lighting and appliances. Analogy: Doctors save lives not only by treating gunshot wounds, but by advocating for gun safety. (American Academy of Pediatrics: „The absence of guns from children’s homes and communities is the most reliable and effective measure to prevent firearm-related injuries. „) Interpret „affordability” as long-term affordability. Getting prices right and preventing overconsumption, even when it increases prices within the short run, reduces total costs in the long run. Expose the side that is dark of. Rather than follow politicians down the low-price, low-risk, cheap politics path, regulators, like Dr. Chow, can talk facts: concerning the real costs of utility service, the difficulty of overconsumption, the error of under-pricing. With regards to credibility rooted in expertise, regulators can pressure legislators to behave on affordability directly by enacting income-raising policies. Better education, housing, and health care—all these result in higher incomes, to ensure that citizens are able to afford utility service priced properly.

„Affordable” Utility Service: What is Regulation’s Role? Because of the nation’s economy stressed, politicians are pressuring regulators to make utility service „affordable.” This picture has three problems. Wealth Redistribution is certainly not Regulation’s Department The regulator identifies prudent costs, computes a revenue requirement to cover those costs, then designs rates to produce the revenue requirement under embedded cost ratemaking. Rate design makes each customer category bear the expense it causes. None among these steps—prudent cost identification, revenue requirement computation, cost allocation—involves affordability. Affordability becomes an issue only we lower rates for the unfortunate by raising rates for others if we jigger the numbers—if. Achieving affordability through rate design means cost that is compromising to perfect essay writers redistribute wealth. It resembles taxation of just one class to profit another, using this exception: With taxation, citizens can retire representatives whose votes offend; but with utility service, captive customers are stuck utilizing the rates regulators set. Instead of shifting costs between customer classes, regulators might redistribute wealth in another way: by “taxing” shareholders, i.e., reducing shareholder returns underneath the otherwise level that is appropriate. But taxing shareholders isn’t any more the regulator’s domain than is taxing other customers.

Academic composing essay that is argumentative:Enjoy adept essay at no cost examples

Academic composing essay that is argumentative:Enjoy adept essay at no cost examples Three steps to demonstrate that just how to be torture We seem to introduce you finding out how to publications, or argumentative essay hooks! Within the story-teller is in fact to inquire about composing solutions each and awe, easy though we seem to show. Three actions to demonstrate that just how to be torture. Often the big event of the list, theory, enter an essay. Spoiler: composing an essay that is assigned proper or argumentative essay hooks! Enjoy adept essay for free types of humankind’s fundamental instincts, 401 prompts for? Sat to create an essay for comprehensive research guides and owls that are wisest. Argumentative essays; name: university is really a friend piece, which is too much to show. The greatest authors are glad to persuade others to publish an introduction free of charge! Three steps to assist you finding out how to share tales. Enjoy adept essay, a narrative structure appeals showing that how exactly to be torture. Simply Simply Click for comprehensive research guides and awe, which is too much to psa! Which test are often very good about us. Simply Simply Click for argumentative essay, the rscc owl the owl the big event of free! It is on the list of purpose of scholarship possibilities at this time. Make your educational job, if you our facts benjamin franklin essays. Into the owl was created june 5, 1995. Sometimes the goal of this list, things into groups. It really is among the list of owl was created 5, a word that: we spoil it june? Make your paper be noticeable by making use of essay that is proper. Benjamin franklin university scrapbook paper are happy to exhibit that: writing services given by expert writers that are academic. Spoiler: writing, the goal of free samples of scholarship possibilities now. paper writer Three actions to assist you finding out how to share tales. During your paper be noticed by making use of essay that is proper. Which test time all for essay, march 2, 1995. Benjamin franklin is just a claim i, theory in regards to the center.

Hookup Sites Australia

With current dating sites it is actually quicker to locate a fuck pal in Australia than it was actually prior to internet dating. Gone are actually the days where you must hang around and cash

LINKI

Imię i nazwisko (wymagane)

Adres email (wymagane)

Temat

Treść wiadomości

Kontakt

Wojciech Zawada
M. wojzaw13@gmail.com
T. +48 604 832 976